Abortion: Right or Wrong? - Instablogs
Abortion: Right or Wrong?
Taroona Sharma , new delhi: Dec 14 2006
Made Popular Dec 14 2006

Abortion: Right or Wrong?Is abortion right or wrong? Is it a mere choice or situational response? Many believe it to be equivalent to murder while some do not. Several say it is unimportant, then why was it a determining factor for the presidential votes? How would Americans feel if the government classified life to be a 1 year old? Are we just sitting back letting people do this and not be punished. If this were an accident (rape, incest, etc.), then is it right to abort?

Abortion as defined by Webster is ‘the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus; especially: the medical procedure of inducing expulsion of a human fetus to terminate a pregnancy.’
The definition says that the woman was pregnant and she kills or terminates the embryo (baby) while it is still in its growing stages.

The pro-choice notion says that an embryo during the early stages of pregnancy cannot live outside the womb; it is truly a part of her body and not a separate identity. At this stage if the abortion takes place, a woman is exercising her property rights over her body and not killing an individual. Once the embryo is old enough to live outside the womb, a woman is still under no obligation to carry the child to term. She can invite guests to her house and later ask them to leave. Similarly, she can invite an embryo inside her body and later change her mind. But, if her unwanted guests do not leave immediately she might just pull out a gun and shoot them. This is called ‘overkill’. An abortion during the latter stages of pregnancy is ‘overkill’ as embryo is now an individual.

If our government considers abortion to be legal, then what will hold them back from passing a more serious law about children like the Chinese government? How is it related to abortion? An article in the New York Times statistics showed that out of 100% of women who do get abortions, 21.3% of women cannot afford a baby, 14.1% of women have a relationship issue or their partner does not want a child, and 10.8% of women feel a child will disrupt their education or career. That is only 46.2% of women that get abortions. What about rest?

Let’s say a woman cannot afford to support her child. A pro-life person would say to give the child to an orphanage; a pro-choice person would say to let the women decide. Either way we look at, someone is right, but only one is wrong. Wise men say that when given a choice we make them on circumstances and not on right or wrong. If this is true then could abortion be one of the circumstantial decisions? I fashioned a survey that asked a woman if she would still abort a child if she were established. About 85% percent of them said they would not, and only 15% stated they would. One of my variables was if the woman wanted to have children. This may not speak on a global scale but it still presents a fact that many women have children out of wedlock.

People say that abortion is not an issue that we should be focusing on, and there are more things to be highlighted. Americans never stood for killing the innocent. In 2001 alone abortion clinics killed 1.31 million. Just visualize about 16.5 football stadium’s seating 79,469 children, and then a bomb blows up all 16.5 of them. That would be the biggest tragedy ever in the world. Everyone would wonder what the children did to deserve such heinous punishment. How is this different from killing 1.31 million now? Only 6.1% of women choose to abortion because they are risking maternal health and/or fetal health. Then why are clinics still catering to the other 93.9% of women who do not want the responsibility and/or just do not want the child? Instead of sacrificing a future life, we should sacrifice our own personal pleasure.

Look at abortion from the unborn child’s side. What is the difference between our lives and that of a fetus (aborted child)? It was the women’s choice, and since they chose to have unprotected sex then whatever happened she knew the consequences. The problem is now since the abortion is legal they can have unprotected sex and not deal with the consequences. That is like saying that you can drink and smoke all you want and have excellent health. Say that you were given a choice to cheat on the SAT’s without any penalty. Either cheat or to work hard and to study, which one would you pick. Many people would choose to cheat because they would not have to do any work and because there would not be any penalty for doing it. That is also the mindset of the people who have unprotected sex and abort their unborn child. That is what abortion clinics are allowing women to do. Not only are the clinics performing the procedure but they are doing so without letting their clients know the associated risks. Many clients don’t receive any information on how to take care after the procedure.

According to a National Abortion Federation; abortion information pamphlet, “someone should offer to ‘explain the abortion procedure and what to expect” and “make sure you understand any risks or possible complications in the procedure you will be having.” The pamphlet goes on to explain how medical and surgical abortions are done. It says that “complications are unlikely” and “the provider should also explain what to expect and how to take care of you after the abortion. Thus stating that if there was nothing wrong with it why is there so much conflict surrounding it.

Are Americans selfish enough to take away a life just because the parents are not ready or feel a child would interrupt their education or career? Will Americans just let abortion kill 126,000 children a day? Or, will we stand up for what is right and end abortion now. Abortion may become obsolete when technology permits an embryo to grow outside a woman’s body into a healthy infant. An alternative could be to induce pregnancy than abortion and let the adopted parents take over the responsibilities of nurturing the infant.

Anyone who supports the pro-choice notion believes that embryo is not a human being. On the other hand, those who oppose abortion believe that embryo is a human being. Thus, distinction lies in the definition of human being. Science has proved that embryo is a separate living organism distinct from mother. Still many refuse to consider an embryo as human. They argue that the point where human life begins is unknown. Does this means that there is no objective point where begins? Many people resolve this by saying human life begins at birth. Thus, if a child is killed a day after birth it’s a murder. But what differentiates the same child till a day before birth. Why killing of same child then is not considered a crime?

Some people say human life begins before birth. For them the time when embryo is deemed viable is the start of human life. But this ignores the difference between the fertilized and unfertilized zygote. Still it is not independence that defines human life. Under this view, a baby dependent upon mother would not have the rights of an individual. At the time of conception, something unique takes place. It is a point of change when something unique comes into existence. This new thing is an individual. This therefore marks the beginning of human life. Many individuals claim to be pro active for avoiding interference in other person’s life. Does it mean that laws that outlaw abortion restrict woman’s freedom? Chastity, adoption, motherhood and even use of contraceptives are alternatives to abortion. Men have equal responsibility and if they are not ready to take the responsibility, they must refrain from such activities. If they are not willing to have children, they must not engage in activities that produce children.

Both men and women are biologically different and neither of sexes is inferior. However, the recognition of these differences has resulted in oppression of woman since ages. Thus, there is a growing belief that in order to liberate, it is empirical to deny the aspects of womanhood that make her unique. This includes motherhood. With abortion, a woman endures great injustice and suffering for achieving equality with men. Freedom does not come free of cost not only to children but to women as well.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
4 Stars
I think categorizing abortion as good or as bad depends on the conditions that prompt parents to go with it. For example, if situations like bad economic conditions, uncertainty about future impels parents to go with this option then there is nothing wrong in this. Conversely, if decision of abortion is prompted by mean motives and selfishness then it is wrong.
1 Stars
I believe that abortions should be the personal choice of the girl.

For society to be judgmental about it is not fair.

The statement that 85% percent women would not abort if they were well established says it all.

I am sure that Abortion is no means to deny aspects of womanhood
0 Stars
I totally agree with Kanchan that abortion should be the personal choice of the girl. Both men and women are biologically different and neither of sexes is inferior and abortion is in no way related to aspects of womanhood.
0 Stars
Swarup
New Delhi, India
\”Thus, if a child is killed a day after birth it’s a murder. But what differentiates the same child till a day before birth. Why killing of same child then is not considered a crime? \”.. writer about your this question , I would like to see the whole issue as under.

In india the same is allready for Indian women as per special abortion LAW of 1976.
But the problem is a well health , good child without any reson just for own selfish comfort they kill , that is the crime( Misuse of LAW intentionally).

One hand we say child killing thier on birth right , on the other hand we say let stop female fotecide.
Here the double standard , and hence we do not find the solution and the question rised Abortion: Right or Wrong? .
Neither God or Indian LAW had given any power to kill the Child In the Hnad of Indian Men , then why to blame to Men?

As per study done by SIF ( Save Indian Family) , more than 90% husbands want a girl child, but it is their well educated , well earning wives want the male child.

So my question to you all :
Girl Child –Still a Burden for Indian Wives?
If answer is \”No\” .. why those 5 Crores Girl child gone?
If answer is \”Yes\”, I would like to say :
Education aims to liberate but unfortunately, people have only managed to become literate, and not emancipated.
#postcomment
0 Stars
Swarup
New Delhi, India
Quote by Kanchan
I believe that abortions should be the personal choice of the girl.

For society to be...


In India , the Mother is more educated , kill the female child more than male child.
That is the concern , but no one ready to say that as they faer they will be termed as Abti-women.
That is the key .
0 Stars
Swarup
New Delhi, India
Quote by Nidhi
I totally agree with Kanchan that abortion should be the personal choice of the girl. Both men and...


I totally agree with Kanchan that abortion should be the personal choice of the girl.

If you said this like this it will be better as per me:

I totally agree with Kanchan that abortion should be the personal choice of the girl , as long as she hate to be a Mother.
0 Stars
Ashutosh
Chandigarh, India
instead of a blanket ban on the abortions it should be provided keepng in mind the economic conditions and in many cases wr the child might be unwanted.

there is also one more trouble here women in INDIA are not empowered enough to take their own decision so the gender selection takes place an din many states we are seeing the declining sex-ratio.
you can not deny a women the freedom to decide when she wants to become a mother
0 Stars
Swarup let me make one thing clear i did not mention female feoticide anywhere.
I did not even go into the equations of determining gender.
To determine the gender before birth and to kill the girl child is of course murder!
0 Stars
But to not have a child because the parents are not ready for a baby , IRRESPECTIVE OF ITS GENDER, is the girls right!
To abort as an unwed mother is the girls right!
To abort because of financial constraints, IRRESPECTIVE OF the baby’s GENDER, is the girls right!
0 Stars
Swarup
New Delhi, India
Dear Kanchan,
For your kind information , abortion is allready allowed as per special Loop sided Abortion law of 1976 in India for Indian Women.

Then why the question is arising :
Abortion: Right or Wrong?

There is certain condition mentioned there for abortion.

But people misuing the same and killing the unborn female child as a whole sale free lincence for thier selfish comfort.

If female child killing before the born is not a issue , then the question of this topic will not arise at all .

That is the reason the question arises:
Abortion: Right or Wrong?


Some time I wonder, why people afrid to say the truth directly, instead of trying to make the same double standard.

Your comment:
To determine the gender before birth and to kill the girl child is of course murder!

Killing a child itself a murder let it be Girl child or boy child.
My objection here , crime is crime and punish ment should be as per crime , the same can’t be in some assumption.
Do not take it personnly , this is the reality and our LAW makers unability to give a crime based LAW , result the crime is incresing in our whole society.

Please note sex is not a crime , but rape is a crime.
Same thing for abortion also.
0 Stars
Swarup
New Delhi, India
Quote by Ashutosh
instead of a blanket ban on the abortions it should be provided keepng in mind the economic...


”you can not deny a women the freedom to decide when she wants to become a mother.”

Yes:
”you can not deny a women the freedom to decide when she wants to become a Murder” as as per LAW it is social Service.


Dear read the all study report , the so called freedom of women means killing the child more than so called abala nari.

Update your knowledge my dear.

That is the reson I say:

”Education aims to liberate but unfortunately, people have only managed to become literate, and not emancipated.”
0 Stars
Swarup I would like to say that to have child and to become a mother should be girl’s choice only. But determining the gender before birth and then aborting is definitely a murder. And there are several reasons which the lead to abortion. The basic concept is that to become a mother or not is the girl’s right.
0 Stars
Swarup
New Delhi, India
My dear Nidhi, Who had objected that? Indian LAW as well as GOD never object that.There is a time limit also mentioned, when a girl can abort the child. Please read the Abortion LAW 1976.

Objection is when the intentional killing of unborn child and term that as Normal abortion, for selfish comfort and the same termed as girls choice my dear, specially in married couple.

As you say:

”But determining the gender before birth and then aborting is definitely a murder.”

Why this double standard?

This is the reson we do not get the techenical solution .....

Do you think when some one will abort or kill the unborn child , will deceler that she had not determined the sex of the child?
0 Stars
Well swaruop i’m referring to Normal abortion’s

I fell if parents or a parent can not provide the best for the child they have a right to decide what to do.
All birth control means are not 100% sure.
Lets face practical facts: an unwanted child dashes dreams, is a stress on the population, reduces work efficiency of the mother.

The idealistic dream to kill all else but life results in an incomplete life for the child, bereft of nutrition, good opportunities, much shame( in case of an unwed mother, cos of prejudiced people like you)
0 Stars
Swarup1973,Let’s take a look at the question of Abortions being Moral or not.

You seem to hold a ”pro-life” view and continuously argue that a woman who has an abortion is ”killing a child.” Of course it’s alive. It’s a biological mechanism that converts oxygen into energy that causes its cells to divide, multiply, and grow and every thing else. Sure It’s alive and it is a potential person, a potential brother, a potential sister or son...

But being alive does not give the zygote full human rights - including the right not to be aborted during its gestation.

The problem is that consciousness normally doesn’t occur until months, even years, after a baby is born. This creates a moral dilemma for the defender of abortion rights.

It’s not murder if it’s not an independent person. One might argue, then, that it’s not murder to end the life of any child before he or she reaches consciousness, On the contrary, abortion is an absolutely moral choice for any woman wishing to control her body.
0 Stars
Swarup
New Delhi, India
Pankaj,
”Swarup1973,Let’s take a look at the question of Abortions being Moral or not.”

I have allready told , sex is not a crime ,but rape is a crime.

Same thing for abortion.

For a justified abortion, there is not restrication to any women , the way sex is not a crime.

But where the unjustified Abortion.. which is definetely killing a unborn child.

Here is my objection , as some devoted group are trying to make it a whole sale free lincence to kill the unborn child , specially for married couple.
Wonder , why the abortion right to be given just two days before the borng of the child.
Existing LAW allready says , if some one do not want child, they can very well abort the same before some specified time.
Hence it is not the question of morality or women right , it is simple dadagri to say abortion is women’s birth right.
Whe we want a civilied society , we need some responsibility.
If we want uncivilized society .. there is not need of any LAW or check of any activity.
Hope I clear your thought.
0 Stars
Swarup you are talking about ”Justified” and ”unjustified Abortion”
please make your stand clear!
0 Stars
Swarup
New Delhi, India
Dear Kanchan,
The effort is going on in the whole world, not only in India, Killing of Child can be justified in the name of ”Abortion”.

Now what LAW says : ”unjustified” , please update the knowledge.
For example:

312. Causing miscarriage
Whoever voluntarily causes a woman with child to miscarry, shall, if such miscarriage be not caused in good faith for the purpose of saving the life of the woman, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both; and, if the woman be quick with child, shall he punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.

Explanation- A woman who causes herself to miscarry, is within the meaning of this section.

Further You can see the same from here:IPC313,314,315..etc.
http://www.mynation.net/ipc.htm#_Toc496765187

As per Ranjana Mishra , a so called Social Activist , openly say in Star News Programe , “Indian Women have on birht right to kill the child. No one can question them and Indian Husband does not have any right to ask them why they have killed the un born Child.”

Now my question:

Neither God or Indian LAW had given any power to kill the Child In the Hnad of Indian Men , then why to blame to Men?

Why this double standarad?

I can write a lot, but that will not be possible here in comment section.
0 Stars
now then swarup are you taking about abortions or MEN’S rights!
Do you think men should be able to have kids and abort them?
0 Stars
Swarup
New Delhi, India
Regarding ”Justified Abortion”.
Please read The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 was enacted by the Government of India with the intention of reducing the incidence of illegal abortion and consequent maternal mortality and morbidity.

Grounds on which abortion is permitted:

To save the life of the woman-Yes
To preserve physical health-Yes
To preserve mental health-Yes
Rape or incest- Yes
Foetal impairment-Yes
Economic or social reasons-Yes
Available on request-No

Hope I have cleared your dought.

Demading Whole sale free lincence to kill the unborn child for the shake of ”Womne’s Right” is not a right, it will be considered as ”Dadagri”.
0 Stars
Quote by swarup1973
Regarding ”Justified Abortion”. Please read The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act...
0 Stars
Swarup
New Delhi, India
Dear Kanchan,
”Do you think men should be able to have kids and abort them?”
——
Haa .. not a bad idea!!!!
Very soon we will get a Specail LAW , by which men have to force to produce the child my dear..wait and watch for 22nd century!!!

Allready the LAW exist, if any Men ask his wife, why she killed the unborn child.. that is crime( mental crulity) and not only he , along with him , his age old mother/cousin sister will be behind the bar...

Stop the gendar war.

Men are from ”Mars” and women are from ”Venous”, which I belive and respect.

No law can Change that.Their are certain advantages and disadvantages for both men and women and in the road, society or office, when the fight go on between a Man vs Women , we beat the Man only irrespective the women is worng or man is wrong.

This is called ”Men Badnam”.

Indian Men does not have any right to get the social as well as legal justice , so forget about the question of killing the unborn child by them and get scot free and moving freely in the society.
0 Stars
Women’s rights are not in conflict with their own children’s rights When women have the sexual respect and employment flexibility they need, they will no longer seek as a substitute life for abortion.
0 Stars
Swarup
New Delhi, India
”Women’s rights are in conflict with their own children’s rights, refuse to give them the Fater’s face, When women have the sexual disrespect and employment flexibility( Both option either to work or sit at home for eating Samaoshas) they need, they will no longer seek as a substitute life for abortion.

Who says .. women are ”Abala Nari”???

Men.. do not speek any thing regarding thier whole sale free lincence to kill the un born Child.. your job .. just earn the money and feed them .. let you work in five star hotel or in raiway station as a ”Coole”.. just be a good ”Free ATM Machine”.

Right ??

By the way Kanchan , suddenly the personnel attack stopped !!!
Do not worry I don’t mind at all, read your own comment:

”The idealistic dream to kill all else but life results in an incomplete life for the child, bereft of nutrition, good opportunities, much shame( in case of an unwed mother, cos of prejudiced people like you)”
0 Stars
Well u do have prejudiced opinions some what like a male chauvanist that is why u muuust have the last word.....
0 Stars
Swarup
New Delhi, India
haa...Kanchan, now I am really feeling pity!!!

”Well u do have prejudiced opinions some what like a Female chauvanist that is why u muuust have the last word as well comments and diverting the main issue.....

By the way the comment written by you only my dear.

Any way it is out of discussion about this topic, you can write a new article for that.

This is my view repate it:

”Demading Whole sale free lincence to kill the unborn child for the shake of ”Womne’s Right” is not a right, it will be considered as ”Dadagri”.”
0 Stars
I guess you missed the comment but not at all a problem try next time.
Add your Comment